---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#alternate Edit this page Wikipedia (en)
History of Unix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Main article: Unix
CAPTION: Unix
Unix history-simple.svg
Evolution of Unix and Unix-like systems
Developer Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, Brian Kernighan, Douglas
McIlroy, and Joe Ossanna at Bell Labs
Written in C and Assembly language
OS family Unix
Working state Current
Source model Historically closed source, now some Unix projects (BSD
family and Illumos) are open sourced.
Initial release 1969; 52 years ago (1969)
Available in English
Kernel type Monolithic
Default user interface Command-line interface & Graphical (X Window
System)
License Proprietary
Official website opengroup.org/unix
The history of Unix dates back to the mid-1960s when the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, AT&T Bell Labs, and General Electric were
jointly developing an experimental time-sharing operating system called
Multics for the GE-645 mainframe.^[1] Multics introduced many
innovations, but had many problems.
Bell Labs, frustrated by the size and complexity of Multics but not the
aims, slowly pulled out of the project. Their last researchers to leave
Multics - Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, Doug McIlroy, and Joe Ossanna
among others^[2] - decided to redo the work on a much smaller
scale.^[3] In 1979, Dennis Ritchie described their vision for Unix:^[3]
What we wanted to preserve was not just a good environment in which
to do programming, but a system around which a fellowship could
form. We knew from experience that the essence of communal
computing, as supplied by remote-access, time-shared machines, is
not just to type programs into a terminal instead of a keypunch, but
to encourage close communication.
[ ]
Contents
* 1 1969
* 2 1970s
* 3 1980s
+ 3.1 Standardization and the Unix wars
* 4 1990s
* 5 2000s
* 6 See also
* 7 References
* 8 Further reading
* 9 External links
1969[edit]
In the late 1960s, Bell Labs was involved in a project with MIT and
General Electric to develop a time-sharing system, called Multiplexed
Information and Computing Service (Multics), allowing multiple users to
access a mainframe simultaneously. Dissatisfied with the project's
progress, Bell Labs management ultimately withdrew.
Ken Thompson, a programmer in the Labs' computing research department,
had worked on Multics. He decided to write his own operating system.
While he still had access to the Multics environment, he wrote
simulations for the new file and paging system^[clarification needed]
on it. He also programmed a game called Space Travel, but it needed a
more efficient and less expensive machine to run on, and eventually he
found a little-used Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-7 at Bell
Labs.^[4]^[5] On the PDP-7, in 1969, a team of Bell Labs researchers
led by Thompson and Ritchie, including Rudd Canaday, implemented a
hierarchical file system, the concepts of computer processes and device
files, a command-line interpreter, and some small utility programs,
modeled on the corresponding features in Multics, but simplified.^[3]
The resulting system, much smaller and simpler than Multics, was to
become Unix. In about a month's time, in August 1969, Thompson had
implemented a self-hosting operating system with an assembler, editor
and shell, using a GECOS machine for bootstrapping.^[6]
Douglas McIlroy then ported TMG compiler-compiler to PDP-7 assembly,
creating the first high-level language running on Unix. Thompson used
this tool to develop the first version of his B programming
language.^[3]
1970s[edit]
Ken Thompson (sitting) and Dennis Ritchie working together at a PDP-11
Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie
Version 7 Unix for the PDP-11, running in SIMH
Unix time-sharing at the University of Wisconsin, 1978
The new operating system was initially without organizational backing,
and also without a name. At this stage, the new operating system was a
singletasking operating system,^[3] not a multitasking one such as
Multics. The name Unics (Uniplexed Information and Computing Service,
pronounced as "eunuchs"), a pun on Multics (Multiplexed Information and
Computer Services), was initially suggested for the project in 1970.
Brian Kernighan claims the coining for himself, and adds that "no one
can remember" who came up with the final spelling Unix.^[7] Dennis
Ritchie and Doug McIlroy also credit Kernighan.^[3]^[8]
When the Computing Sciences Research Center wanted to use Unix on a
machine larger than the PDP-7, while another department needed a word
processor, Thompson and Ritchie added text processing capabilities to
Unix and received funding for a PDP-11/20.^[5] For the first time in
1970, the Unix operating system was officially named and ran on the
PDP-11/20. A text-formatting program called roff and a text editor were
added. All three were written in PDP-11/20 assembly language. Bell Labs
used this initial text-processing system, consisting of Unix, roff, and
the editor, for text processing of patent applications. Roff soon
evolved into troff, the first electronic publishing program with full
typesetting capability.
As the system grew in complexity and the research team wanted more
users, the need for a manual grew apparent. The UNIX Programmer's
Manual was published on 3 November 1971; commands were documented in
the "man page" format that is still used, offering terse reference
information about usage as well as bugs in the software, and listing
the authors of programs to channel questions to them.^[8]
After other Bell Labs departments purchased DEC PDP-11s, they also
chose to run Unix instead of DEC's own operating system. By Version 4
it was widely used within the laboratory and a Unix Support Group was
formed, helping the operating system survive by formalizing its
distribution.^[5]^[8]
In 1973, Version 4 Unix was rewritten in the higher-level language C,
contrary to the general notion at the time that an operating system's
complexity and sophistication required it to be written in assembly
language.^[9]^[5] The C language appeared as part of Version 2.
Thompson and Ritchie were so influential on early Unix that McIlroy
estimated that they wrote and debugged about 100,000 lines of code that
year, stating that "[their names] may safely be assumed to be attached
to almost everything not otherwise attributed".^[8] Although assembly
did not disappear from the man pages until Version 8,^[8] the migration
to C suggested portability of the software, requiring only a relatively
small amount of machine-dependent code to be replaced when porting Unix
to other computing platforms. Version 4 Unix, however, still had
considerable PDP-11-dependent code and was not suitable for porting.
The first port to other platform was made five years later (1978) for
Interdata 8/32.^[10]
The Unix operating system was first presented formally to the outside
world at the 1973 Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, where
Ritchie and Thompson delivered a paper. This led to requests for the
system, but under a 1956 consent decree in settlement of an antitrust
case, the Bell System (the parent organization of Bell Labs) was
forbidden from entering any business other than "common carrier
communications services", and was required to license any patents it
had upon request.^[6] Unix could not, therefore, be turned into a
product. Bell Labs instead shipped the system for the cost of media and
shipping.^[6] Ken Thompson quietly began answering requests by shipping
out tapes and disks, each accompanied by - according to legend - a note
signed, "Love, Ken".^[11]
In 1973, AT&T released Version 5 Unix and licensed it to educational
institutions, and licensed 1975's Version 6 to companies for the first
time.^[12] While commercial users were rare because of the US$20,000
(equivalent to $95,028 in 2019) cost, the latter was the most widely
used version into the early 1980s. Anyone could purchase a license, but
the terms were very restrictive; licensees only received the source
code, on an as-is basis.^[12] The licenses also included the
machine-dependent parts of the kernel, written in PDP-11 assembly
language. Copies of the Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with
Source Code circulated widely, which led to considerable use of Unix as
an educational example. The first meeting of Unix users took place in
New York in 1974, attracting a few dozen people; this would later grow
into the USENIX organization. The importance of the user group stemmed
from the fact that Unix was entirely unsupported by AT&T.^[6]
Versions of the Unix system were determined by editions of its user
manuals;^[12] for example, "Fifth Edition UNIX" and "UNIX Version 5"
have both been used to designate the same version. The Bell Labs
developers did not think in terms of "releases" of the operating
system, instead using a model of continuous development, and sometimes
distributing tapes with patches (without AT&T lawyers' approval).^[6]
Development expanded, adding the concept of pipes, which led to the
development of a more modular code base, and quicker development
cycles. Version 5, and especially Version 6, led to a plethora of
different Unix versions both inside and outside Bell Labs, including
PWB/UNIX and the first commercial Unix, IS/1.
Unix still only ran on DEC systems.^[12] As more of the operating
system was rewritten in C (and the C language extended to accommodate
this), portability also increased; in 1977, Bell Labs procured an
Interdata 8/32 with the aim of porting Unix to a computer that was as
different from the PDP-11 as possible, making the operating system more
machine-independent in the process. Unix next ran as a guest operating
system inside a VM/370 hypervisor at Princeton. Simultaneously, a group
at the University of Wollongong ported Unix to the similar Interdata
7/32.^[13] Target machines of further Bell Labs ports for research and
AT&T-internal use included an Intel 8086-based computer (with
custom-built MMU) and the UNIVAC 1100.^[14]^[5]
In May 1975, ARPA documented the benefits of the Unix time-sharing
system which "presents several interesting capabilities" as an ARPA
network mini-host in RFC 681.
In 1978, UNIX/32V was released for DEC's then new VAX system. By this
time, over 600 machines were running Unix in some form. Version 7 Unix,
the last version of Research Unix to be released widely, was released
in 1979. In Version 7, the number of system calls was only around 50,
although later Unix and Unix-like systems would add many more:^[15]
Version 7 of the Research UNIX System provided about 50 system
calls, 4.4BSD provided about 110, and SVR4 had around 120. The exact
number of system calls varies depending on the operating system
version. More recent systems have seen incredible growth in the
number of supported system calls. Linux 3.2.0 has 380 system calls
and FreeBSD 8.0 has over 450.
A microprocessor port of Unix, to the LSI-11, was completed in
1978,^[16] and an Intel 8086 version was reported to be "in progress"
the same year.^[13] The first microcomputer versions of Unix, and
Unix-like operating systems like Whitesmiths' Idris, appeared in the
late 1970s.^[12]
1980s[edit]
The DEC VT100 terminal, widely used for Unix timesharing
USENIX 1984 Summer speakers. USENIX was founded in 1975, focusing
primarily on the study and development of Unix and similar systems.
The X Window System with twm and a number of core X applications
Bell developed multiple versions of Unix for internal use, such as CB
UNIX (with improved support for databases) and PWB/UNIX, the
"Programmer's Workbench", aimed at large groups of programmers. It
advertised the latter version, as well as 32V and V7, stating that
"more than 800 systems are already in use outside the Bell System" in
1980,^[17] and "more than 2000" the following year.^[18] Research Unix
versions 8, 9, and 10 were developed through the 1980s but were only
released to a few universities, though they did generate papers
describing the new work. This research focus then shifted to the
development of Plan 9 from Bell Labs, a new portable distributed
system.
Because the company widely and inexpensively licensed Unix,^[19] by the
early 1980s thousands of people used Unix at AT&T and elsewhere, and as
computer science students moved from universities into companies they
wanted to continue to use it. Observers began to see Unix as a
potential universal operating system, suitable for all computers. Less
than 20,000 lines of code - almost all in C - composed the Unix kernel
as of 1983, and more than 75% was not machine-dependent. By that year
Unix or a Unix-like system was available for at least 16 different
processors and architectures from about 60 vendors; BYTE noted that
computer companies "may support other [operating] systems, but a Unix
implementation always happens to be available",^[5]^[12]^[20] and that
DEC and IBM supported Unix as an alternative to their proprietary
operating systems.^[21]
Microcomputer Unix became commercially available in 1980, when Onyx
Systems released its Zilog Z8000-based C8002^[12] and Microsoft
announced its first Unix for 16-bit microcomputers called Xenix, which
the Santa Cruz Operation (SCO) ported to the 8086 processor in 1983.
Other companies began to offer commercial versions of Unix for their
own minicomputers and workstations. Many of these new Unix flavors were
developed from the System V base under a license from AT&T; others were
based on BSD. One of the leading developers of BSD, Bill Joy, went on
to co-found Sun Microsystems in 1982 and created SunOS for its
workstations.
AT&T announced UNIX System III - based on Version 7, and PWB - in 1981.
Licensees could sell binary sublicenses for as little as US$100
(equivalent to $281.22 in 2019), which observers believed indicated
that AT&T now viewed Unix as a commercial product.^[12] This also
included support for the VAX. AT&T continued to issue licenses for
older Unix versions. To end the confusion between all its differing
internal versions, AT&T combined them into UNIX System V Release 1.
This introduced a few features such as the vi editor and curses from
the Berkeley Software Distribution of Unix developed at the University
of California, Berkeley Computer Systems Research Group. This also
included support for the Western Electric 3B series computers. AT&T
provided support for System III and System V through the Unix Support
Group (USG), and these systems were sometimes referred to as USG
Unix.^[citation needed]
In 1983, the U.S. Department of Justice settled its second antitrust
case against AT&T, causing the breakup of the Bell System. This
relieved AT&T of the 1956 consent decree that had prevented the company
from commercializing Unix. AT&T promptly introduced Unix System V into
the market. The newly created competition nearly destroyed the
long-term viability of Unix, because it stifled the free exchanging of
source code and led to fragmentation and incompatibility.^[11] The GNU
Project was founded in the same year by Richard Stallman.
Since the newer commercial UNIX licensing terms were not as favorable
for academic use as the older versions of Unix, the Berkeley
researchers continued to develop BSD as an alternative to UNIX System
III and V. Many contributions to Unix first appeared in BSD releases,
notably the C shell with job control (modelled on ITS). Perhaps the
most important aspect of the BSD development effort was the addition of
TCP/IP network code to the mainstream Unix kernel. The BSD effort
produced several significant releases that contained network code:
4.1cBSD, 4.2BSD, 4.3BSD, 4.3BSD-Tahoe ("Tahoe" being the nickname of
the Computer Consoles Inc. Power 6/32 architecture that was the first
non-DEC release of the BSD kernel), Net/1, 4.3BSD-Reno (to match the
"Tahoe" naming, and that the release was something of a gamble), Net/2,
4.4BSD, and 4.4BSD-lite. The network code found in these releases is
the ancestor of much TCP/IP network code in use today, including code
that was later released in AT&T System V UNIX and early versions of
Microsoft Windows. The accompanying Berkeley sockets API is a de facto
standard for networking APIs and has been copied on many platforms.
During this period, many observers expected that UNIX, with its
portability, rich capabilities, and support from companies like DEC and
IBM, was likely to become an industry-standard operating system for
microcomputers.^[21]^[22] Citing its much smaller software library and
installed base than that of MS-DOS and the IBM PC, others expected that
customers would prefer personal computers on local area networks to
Unix multiuser systems.^[23] Microsoft planned to make Xenix MS-DOS's
multiuser successor;^[12] by 1983 a Xenix-based Altos 586 with 512 KB
RAM and 10 MB hard drive cost US$8,000 (equivalent to $20,536 in
2019).^[24] BYTE reported that the Altos "under moderate load
approaches DEC VAX performance for most tasks that a user would
normally invoke", while other computers from Sun and MASSCOMP were much
more expensive but equaled the VAX. The magazine added that both PC/IX
and Venix on the IBM PC outperformed Venix on the PDP-11/23.^[21]
uNETix, a commercial microcomputer Unix, implemented the first Unix
color windowing system.^[citation needed]
In 1986, Computerworld wrote that "Until very recently, almost no one
associated Unix with corporate data processing. [...] the operating
system traveled almost exclusively in academic and technical circles
... But now -- almost entirely because of strenuous efforts by AT&T --
some people are beginning to perceive Unix as a viable option for large
commercial installations." Unix became commercially available for the
mainframe via Amdahl UTS in 1981, and now IBM started offering Unix as
IX/370 and VM/IX. The total installed base of Unix, however, remained
small at some 230,000 machines.^[25]^:37,44
Despite its academic reputation - InfoWorld stated in 1989, "Until
recently, Unix conjured up visions of long-haired bearded technoids
stuck in the bowels of an R&D lab, coding software until the wee hours
of the morning" - the increasing power of microcomputers in the late
1980s, and in particular the introduction of the 32-bit Intel 80386,
caused Unix to "explode" in popularity for business applications;
Xenix, 386/ix, and other Unix systems for the PC-compatible market
competed with OS/2 in terms of networking, multiuser support,
multitasking, and MS-DOS compatibility.^[26] The beginning in 1984 of
the annual Unix Expo trade show in New York reflected the growing
commercial presence of Unix.^[27]
During this time a number of vendors including Digital Equipment, Sun,
Addamax and others began building trusted versions of UNIX for high
security applications, mostly designed for military and law enforcement
applications.
Standardization and the Unix wars[edit]
Main article: Unix wars
A problem that plagued Unix in this period was the multitude of
implementations, based on either System V, BSD, or what Poul-Henning
Kamp later described as a "more or less competently executed"
combination of the two,^[28] usually with home-grown extensions to the
base systems from AT&T or Berkeley.^[25]^:38 Xenix was effectively a
third lineage, being based on the earlier System III.^[29] The rivalry
between vendors was called the Unix wars; customers soon demanded
standardization.^[29]
AT&T responded by issuing a standard, the System V Interface Definition
(SVID, 1985), and required conformance for operating systems to be
branded "System V". In 1984, several European computer vendors
established the X/Open consortium with the goal of creating an open
system specification based on Unix (and eventually the SVID).^[30] Yet
another standardization effort was the IEEE's POSIX specification
(1988), designed as a compromise API readily implemented on both BSD
and System V platforms. POSIX was soon^[when?] mandated by the United
States government for many of its own systems.^[citation needed]
In the spring of 1988, AT&T took the standardization a step further.
First, it collaborated with SCO to merge System V and Xenix into System
V/386.^[29] Next, it sought collaboration with Sun Microsystems (vendor
of the 4.2BSD derivative SunOS and its Network File System) to merge
System V, BSD/SunOS and Xenix into a single unified Unix, which would
become System V Release 4. AT&T and Sun, as UNIX International (UI),
acted independently of X/Open and drew ire from other vendors, which
started the Open Software Foundation to work on their own unified Unix,
OSF/1, ushering in a new phase of the Unix wars.^[29]
1990s[edit]
Unix workstations of the 1990s, including those made by DEC, HP, SGI,
and Sun
The Common Desktop Environment (CDE) was widely used on Unix
workstations.
The Unix wars continued into the 1990s, but turned out to be less
serious of a threat than it originally looked: AT&T and Sun went their
own ways after System V.4, while OSF/1's schedule slipped behind.^[29]
By 1993, most commercial vendors changed their variants of Unix to be
based on System V with many BSD features added. The creation of the
Common Open Software Environment (COSE) initiative that year, by the
major players in Unix, marked the end of the most notorious phase of
the Unix wars, and was followed by the merger of UI and OSF in 1994.
The new combined entity retained the OSF name and stopped work on
OSF/1. By that time the only vendor using it was Digital Equipment
Corporation, which continued its own development, rebranding their
product Digital UNIX in early 1995. POSIX became the unifying standard
for Unix systems (and some other operating systems).^[29]
Meanwhile, the BSD world saw its own developments. The group at
Berkeley moved its operating system toward POSIX compliance and
released a stripped-down version of its networking code, supposedly
without any code that was the property of AT&T. In 1991, a group of BSD
developers (Donn Seeley, Mike Karels, Bill Jolitz, and Trent Hein) left
the University of California to found Berkeley Software Design, Inc.
(BSDi), which sold a fully functional commercial version of BSD Unix
for the Intel platform, which they advertised as free of AT&T code.
They ran into legal trouble when AT&T's Unix subsidiary sued BSDi for
copyright infringement and various other charges in relation to BSD;
subsequently, the University of California countersued.^[31] Shortly
after it was founded, Bill Jolitz left BSDi to pursue distribution of
386BSD, the free software ancestor of FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD.
Shortly after UNIX System V Release 4 was produced, AT&T sold all its
rights to UNIX to Novell. Dennis Ritchie likened this sale to the
Biblical story of Esau selling his birthright for the mess of
pottage.^[32] Novell developed its own version, UnixWare, merging its
NetWare with UNIX System V Release 4. Novell tried to use this as a
marketing tool against Windows NT, but their core markets suffered
considerably. It also quickly settled the court battles with BSDi and
Berkeley.^[31]
In 1993, Novell decided to transfer the UNIX trademark and
certification rights to the X/Open Consortium.^[33] In 1996, X/Open
merged with OSF, creating the Open Group. Various standards by the Open
Group now define what is and what is not a UNIX operating system,
notably the post-1998 Single UNIX Specification.
In 1995, the business of administering and supporting the existing UNIX
licenses, plus rights to further develop the System V code base, were
sold by Novell to the Santa Cruz Operation.^[34] Whether Novell also
sold the copyrights would later become the subject of litigation (see
below).
With the legal troubles between AT&T/Novell and the University of
California over, the latter did two more releases of BSD before
disbanding its Computer Systems Research Group in 1995. The BSD code
lived on, however, in its free derivatives and in what Garfinkel et al.
call a second generation of commercial Unix systems, based on BSD. The
first exponent of these was BSDi's offering, popular at internet
service providers but eventually not successful enough to sustain the
company.^[29]^:22 The other main exponent would be Apple Computer.
In 1997, Apple sought a new foundation for its Macintosh operating
system and chose NeXTSTEP, an operating system developed by NeXT. The
core operating system, which was based on BSD and the Mach kernel, was
renamed Darwin after Apple acquired it. The deployment of Darwin in Mac
OS X makes it, according to a statement made by an Apple employee at a
USENIX conference, the most widely used Unix-based system in the
desktop computer market.^[citation needed]
Meanwhile, Unix got competition from the copyleft Linux kernel, a
reimplementation of Unix from scratch, using parts of the GNU project
that had been underway since the mid-1980s. Work on Linux began in 1991
by Linus Torvalds; in 1998, a confidential memo at Microsoft stated,
"Linux is on track to eventually own the x86 UNIX market," and further
predicted, "I believe that Linux - moreso than NT - will be the biggest
threat to SCO in the near future."^[35]
2000s[edit]
History of computing
Hardware
* Hardware before 1960
* Hardware 1960s to present
Software
* Software
* Unix
* Free software and open-source software
Computer science
* Artificial intelligence
* Compiler construction
* Early computer science
* Operating systems
* Programming languages
* Prominent pioneers
* Software engineering
Modern concepts
* General-purpose CPUs
* Graphical user interface
* Internet
* Laptops
* Personal computers
* Video games
* World Wide Web
By country
* Bulgaria
* Poland
* Romania
* Soviet Bloc
* Soviet Union
* Yugoslavia
Timeline of computing
* before 1950
* 1950-1979
* 1980-1989
* 1990-1999
* 2000-2009
* 2010-2019
* 2020-2029
* more timelines ...
Glossary of computer science
* Category Category
* v
* t
* e
In 2000, SCO sold its entire UNIX business and assets to Caldera
Systems, which later changed its name to The SCO Group.
The bursting of the dot-com bubble (2001-03) led to significant
consolidation of versions of Unix. Of the many commercial variants of
Unix that were born in the 1980s, only Solaris, HP-UX, and AIX were
still doing relatively well in the market, though SGI's IRIX persisted
for quite some time. Of these, Solaris had the largest market share in
2005.^[36]
In 2003, the SCO Group started legal action against various users and
vendors of Linux. SCO had alleged that Linux contained copyrighted Unix
code now owned by the SCO Group. Other allegations included
trade-secret violations by IBM, or contract violations by former Santa
Cruz customers who had since converted to Linux. However, Novell
disputed the SCO Group's claim to hold copyright on the UNIX source
base. According to Novell, SCO (and hence the SCO Group) are
effectively franchise operators for Novell, which also retained the
core copyrights, veto rights over future licensing activities of SCO,
and 95% of the licensing revenue. The SCO Group disagreed with this,
and the dispute resulted in the SCO v. Novell lawsuit. On 10 August
2007, a major portion of the case was decided in Novell's favor (that
Novell had the copyright to UNIX, and that the SCO Group had improperly
kept money that was due to Novell). The court also ruled that "SCO is
obligated to recognize Novell's waiver of SCO's claims against IBM and
Sequent". After the ruling, Novell announced they have no interest in
suing people over Unix and stated, "We don't believe there is Unix in
Linux".^[37]^[38]^[39] SCO successfully got the 10th Circuit Court of
Appeals to partially overturn this decision on 24 August 2009 which
sent the lawsuit back to the courts for a jury trial.^[40]^[41]^[42]
On 30 March 2010, following a jury trial, Novell, and not The SCO
Group, was "unanimously [found]" to be the owner of the UNIX and
UnixWare copyrights.^[43] The SCO Group, through bankruptcy trustee
Edward Cahn, decided to continue the lawsuit against IBM for causing a
decline in SCO revenues.^[44] On March 1, 2016, SCO's lawsuit against
IBM was dismissed with prejudice.
See also: SCO-Linux controversies
In 2005, Sun Microsystems released the bulk of its Solaris system code
(based on UNIX System V Release 4) into an open source project called
OpenSolaris. New Sun OS technologies, notably the ZFS file system, were
first released as open source code via the OpenSolaris project. Soon
afterwards, OpenSolaris spawned several non-Sun distributions. In 2010,
after Oracle acquired Sun, OpenSolaris was officially discontinued, but
the development of derivatives continued.
Since the early 2000s, Linux is the leading Unix-like operating system,
with other variants of Unix (apart from macOS) having only a negligible
market share (see Usage share of operating systems).
See also[edit]
* Comparison of operating systems
* List of Unix systems
* Operating systems timeline
* Plan 9 from Bell Labs
References[edit]
1. ^ Stuart, Brian L. (2009). Principles of operating systems: design
& applications. Boston, Massachusetts: Thompson Learning. p. 23.
ISBN 978-1-4188-3769-3.
2. ^ "In the Beginning: Unix at Bell Labs".
3. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Ritchie, Dennis M. (1984). "The Evolution of
the Unix Time-sharing System". AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical
Journal. 63 (6 Part 2): 1577-93.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1984.tb00054.x. Archived from the original
on 6 May 2010. As PDF
4. ^ "The Creation of the UNIX* Operating System: The famous PDP-7
comes to the rescue". Bell-labs.com. Archived from the original on
2 April 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
5. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f "The History of Unix". BYTE. August 1983.
p. 188. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
6. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Salus, Peter H. (2005). The Daemon, the Gnu and
the Penguin. Groklaw. "In August 1969, Ken Thompson's wife Bonnie
took their year-old son on a trip to California to show off to
their families. As a temporary bachelor, Ken had time to work. 'I
allocated a week each to the operating system, the shell, the
editor and the assembler [he told me]... and during the month she
was gone, it was totally rewritten in a form that looked like an
operating system'"
7. ^ Dolya, Aleksey (29 July 2003). "Interview with Brian Kernighan".
Linux Journal.
8. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e McIlroy, M. D. (1987). A Research Unix reader:
annotated excerpts from the Programmer's Manual, 1971-1986 (PDF)
(Technical report). CSTR. Bell Labs. 139.
9. ^ Stallings, William (2005). Operating Systems: Internals and
Design Principles (5th ed.). Pearson Education. p. 91.
ISBN 978-8131703045.
10. ^ "Portability of C Programs and the UNIX System". Bell-labs.com.
Retrieved 4 November 2017.
11. ^ ^a ^b "Origins and History of Unix, 1969-1995". Faqs.org.
Retrieved 9 November 2010.
12. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ^i Fiedler, Ryan (October 1983). "The
Unix Tutorial / Part 3: Unix in the Microcomputer Marketplace".
BYTE. p. 132. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
13. ^ ^a ^b Johnson, Stephen C.; Ritchie, Dennis M. (1978).
"Portability of C Programs and the UNIX System". Bell System
Technical Journal. 57 (6): 2021-48.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02141.x. S2CID 17510065.
14. ^ Bodenstab, D. E.; Houghton, T. F.; Kelleman, K. A.; Ronkin, G.;
Schan, E. P. (1984). "UNIX Operating System Porting Experiences".
AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal. 63 (8): 1769-90.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1984.tb00064.x. S2CID 35326182.
15. ^ Stevens, W. Richard; Rago, Stephen A. (2013). "1.11 System Calls
and Library Functions". Advanced Programming in the UNIX
Environment (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 21. ISBN 978-0321638007.
16. ^ Lycklama, Heinz (1978). "UNIX Time-Sharing System: UNIX on a
Microprocessor". Bell System Technical Journal. 57 (6): 2087-2101.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02143.x. S2CID 39236801.
17. ^ Bell System Software (April 1980). "(Advertisement)" (PDF).
Australian Unix Users Group Newsletter. 2 (4). p. 8.
18. ^ Ritchie, Dennis M. "Unix Advertising". former Bell Labs Computing
and Mathematical Sciences Research. Archived from the original on 2
January 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2014.
19. ^ Morgan, Chris (January 1982). "Of IBM, Operating Systems, and
Rosetta Stones". BYTE. p. 6. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
20. ^ Tilson, Michael (October 1983). "Moving Unix to New Machines".
BYTE. p. 266. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
21. ^ ^a ^b ^c Hinnant, David F. (August 1984). "Benchmarking UNIX
Systems". BYTE. pp. 132-135, 400-409. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
22. ^ "UNIX". The Computer Chronicles. 1985.
23. ^ Howitt, Doran (10 December 1984). "Unix and the Single User".
InfoWorld. p. 28. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
24. ^ Yates, Jean L. (October 1983). "Unix and the Standardization of
Small Computer Systems". BYTE. pp. 160-166. Retrieved 30 January
2015.
25. ^ ^a ^b Kelleher, Joanne (3 February 1986). "Corporate Unix: A
system struggles to earn its stripes". Computerworld.
26. ^ Jeff Tye; Lauren Black; Gregory Smith (10 July 1989). "Unix on
the desktop: 80386-based Unix multiuser operating systems present
an alternative to LANs". InfoWorld.
27. ^ Marshall, Martin (18 December 1989). "Hopes of Reunification
Highlight Eventful Year for Unix Community". InfoWorld. p. 41.
28. ^ Kamp, Poul-Henning (2012). "A Generation Lost in the Bazaar". ACM
Queue. 10 (8): 20-23. doi:10.1145/2346916.2349257. S2CID 11656592.
29. ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Garfinkel, Simson; Spafford, Gene; Schwartz,
Alan (2003). "2 Unix History and Lineage". Practical UNIX and
Internet Security. O'Reilly. pp. 15-17. ISBN 978-1449310127.
30. ^ Libes, Don; Ressler, Sandy; Ressler, Sanford (1989). Life With
UNIX: A Guide For Everyone. Prentice Hall. p. 74.
ISBN 978-0-13-536657-8.
31. ^ ^a ^b McKusick, Marshall Kirk (1999). "Twenty Years of Berkeley
Unix - From AT&T-Owned to Freely Redistributable". In DiBona,
Chris; Ockman, Sam; Stone, Mark (eds.). Open Sources: Voices from
the Revolution. O'Reilly. ISBN 978-1-56592-582-3.
32. ^ "comp.unix.questions | Google Groups". Retrieved 9 November 2010.
33. ^ Chuck Karish. "The name UNIX is now the property of X/Open -
comp.std.unix | Google Groups". Retrieved 9 November 2010.
34. ^ "HP, Novell and SCO To Deliver High-Volume UNIX OS With Advanced
Network And Enterprise Services". Novell.com. 20 September 1995.
Retrieved 9 November 2010.
35. ^ Vinod Valloppillil (11 August 1998). "Open Source Software: A
(New?) Development Methodology". Retrieved 3 February 2014.
36. ^ Stephen (7 December 2005). "Itanium: A cautionary tale". Tech
News. ZDNet. Archived from the original on 23 September 2006.
Retrieved 4 October 2006. "In the third quarter of this year, 7,845
Itanium servers were sold, according to research by Gartner. That
compares with 62,776 machines with Sun Microsystems' UltraSparc,
31,648 with IBM's Power, and 9,147 with HP's PA-RISC."
37. ^ "Memorandum and Decision Order in SCO v. Novell". Groklaw.net.
Retrieved 9 November 2010.
38. ^ "Tuxrocks.com" (PDF). Retrieved 6 January 2012.
39. ^ Novell Won't Pursue Unix Copyrights 15 August 2007
40. ^ "Appeal Ruling: 08-4217: The SCO Group v. Novell" (PDF). United
States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. 24 August 2009.
01018260169.
41. ^ Novell.com 24 August 2009
42. ^ Kravets, David (24 August 2009). "It's Baaaack ... Appeals Court
Resurrects SCO Lawsuit". Wired.
43. ^ "03/30/2010 - 846 - JURY VERDICT for Defendant Novell. (slm)
(Entered: 03/30/2010)" (PDF). Retrieved 9 November 2010.
44. ^ Harvey, Tom (30 March 2010). "Decision in SCO-Novell case ripples
beyond Utah". Salt Lake Tribune.
Further reading[edit]
Books.
*
Kernighan, Brian W. (2019). UNIX: A History and a Memoir. Independently
published. ISBN 978-1695978553.
Salus, Peter H. (1994). A Quarter Century of UNIX. Addison Wesley.
ISBN 978-0-201-54777-1.
Television.
*
"UNIX". The Computer Chronicles. 1985.
"Unix". The Computer Chronicles. 1989.
Talks.
*
Ken Thompson (2019). "VCF East 2019 -- Brian Kernighan interviews Ken
Thompson" (Interview).
Dr Marshall Kirk McKusick (2006). History of the Berkeley Software
Distributions (three one-hour lectures).
External links[edit]
Look up Unix in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
* The UNIX System, at The Open Group.
* The Creation of the UNIX Operating System
* The Unix Heritage Society
+ The Unix Tree: files from historic releases
* History of Unix at Curlie
* The Unix 1st Edition Manuals.
* 1982 film about Unix featuring Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, Brian
Kernighan, Alfred Aho, and more
* Video: VCF East 2019 -- Brian Kernighan interviews Ken Thompson
* A History of UNIX before Berkeley: UNIX Evolution: 1975-1984
* audio bsdtalk170 - Marshall Kirk McKusick at DCBSDCon -- on history
of tcp/ip (in BSD) -- abridgement of the three lectures on the
history of BSD.
* v
* t
* e
Unix and Unix-like operating systems and compatibility layers
Operating systems
* BSD
+ 386BSD
o FreeBSD
o NetBSD
o OpenBSD
o DragonFly BSD
+ NeXTSTEP
+ Darwin
o macOS
o iOS
o watchOS
o tvOS
o audioOS
o iPadOS
+ SunOS
+ Ultrix
* Coherent
* GNU
* Linux
+ Android
+ Chrome OS
* LynxOS
* MINIX
* QNX
+ BlackBerry 10
* Research Unix
* System V
+ A/UX
+ AIX
+ HP-UX
+ illumos
+ IRIX
+ OpenServer
+ Solaris
+ Tru64 UNIX
+ UnixWare
* Xenix
* z/OS
* more...
Compatibility layers
* Eunice
* Interix
* MachTen
* Microsoft POSIX subsystem
* MKS Toolkit
* P.I.P.S.
* UserLAnd Technologies
* Windows Services for UNIX
* Windows Subsystem for Linux
* Italics indicate discontinued branches. Category Category
* Commons page Commons
* Wikipedia book Book
* v
* t
* e
Operating systems
General
* Advocacy
* Comparison
* Forensic engineering
* History
* Hobbyist development
* List
* Timeline
* Usage share
Variants
* Disk operating system
* Distributed operating system
* Embedded operating system
* Mobile operating system
* Network operating system
* Object-oriented operating system
* Real-time operating system
* Supercomputer operating system
Kernel
Architectures
* Exokernel
* Hybrid
* Microkernel
* Monolithic
* vkernel
* Rump kernel
* Unikernel
Components
* Device driver
* Loadable kernel module
* Microkernel
* User space
Process management
Concepts
* Computer multitasking (Cooperative, Preemptive)
* Context switch
* Interrupt
* IPC
* Process
* Process control block
* Real-time
* Thread
* Time-sharing
Scheduling
algorithms
* Fixed-priority preemptive
* Multilevel feedback queue
* Round-robin
* Shortest job next
Memory management,
resource protection
* Bus error
* General protection fault
* Memory protection
* Paging
* Protection ring
* Segmentation fault
* Virtual memory
Storage access,
file systems
* Boot loader
* Defragmentation
* Device file
* File attribute
* Inode
* Journal
* Partition
* Virtual file system
* Virtual tape library
Supporting concepts
* API
* Computer network
* HAL
* Live CD
* Live USB
* OS shell
+ CLI
+ GUI
+ 3D GUI
+ NUI
+ TUI
+ VUI
+ ZUI
* PXE
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Unix&oldid=99725
1912"
Categories:
* Unix history
Hidden categories:
* Use dmy dates from September 2013
* Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2015
* All articles with unsourced statements
* Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011
* Articles with unsourced statements from April 2015
* All articles with vague or ambiguous time
* Vague or ambiguous time from February 2015
* Articles with unsourced statements from February 2015
* Articles with unsourced statements from March 2014
* Articles with Curlie links
Navigation menu
Personal tools
* Not logged in
* Talk
* Contributions
* Create account
* Log in
Namespaces
* Article
* Talk
[ ]
Variants
Views
* Read
* Edit
* View history
[ ]
More
Search
____________________ Search Go
Navigation
* Main page
* Contents
* Current events
* Random article
* About Wikipedia
* Contact us
* Donate
Contribute
* Help
* Learn to edit
* Community portal
* Recent changes
* Upload file
Tools
* What links here
* Related changes
* Upload file
* Special pages
* Permanent link
* Page information
* Cite this page
* Wikidata item
Print/export
* Download as PDF
* Printable version
Languages
* Deutsch
* f+a+r+s+
*
* a+r+d+w+
Edit links
* This page was last edited on 30 December 2020, at 17:51 (UTC).
* Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree
to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia(R) is a
registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a
non-profit organization.
* Privacy policy
* About Wikipedia
* Disclaimers
* Contact Wikipedia
* Mobile view
* Developers
* Statistics
* Cookie statement
* Wikimedia Foundation
* Powered by MediaWiki
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------